<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Econometrics on Alexander Kriwoluzky</title>
    <link>https://www.alexanderkriwoluzky.com/tags/econometrics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Econometrics on Alexander Kriwoluzky</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.alexanderkriwoluzky.com/tags/econometrics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Same, but different? Testing monetary policy shock measures</title>
      <link>https://www.alexanderkriwoluzky.com/publications/different_mon_pol/different_mon_pol/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.alexanderkriwoluzky.com/publications/different_mon_pol/different_mon_pol/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h5 id=&#34;abstract&#34;&gt;Abstract&#xA;  &lt;a href=&#34;#abstract&#34;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;&lt;/h5&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In this study, we determine the reliability and exogeneity of popular monetary policy shock measures, including the narrative series of Romer and Romer (2004), the high-frequency series of Barakchian and Crowe (2013), and the high-frequency series of Gertler and Karadi (2015). To this end, we employ test statistics used in the literature to detect weak proxy variables. We find that the measure derived by Gertler and Karadi (2015) is the most suitable in this regard. [web:313][web:315]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
